Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Keisel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - his userpage already exists. Sango123 02:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ken Keisel

Delete - vanity entry, creator and subject are the same person, does not assert notability either--Nobunaga24 00:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, no assertion of notability. -- The Anome 00:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Move to user page, get rid of the rest of the stuff. --Wafulz 01:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Pure vanity. Article was created by article name. No reason to move or userfy. SynergeticMaggot 01:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vain vanity in vain. Danny Lilithborne 01:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. --דניאל ^{talk contribs Email} 02:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete When they list their email address, it's celarly vanity --Xrblsnggt 03:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Closest thing to notability asserted involves either a) "G" on some "wall of fame" that would probably venture into indiscrim-collection territory if we listed everyone with equivalent notability, or b) "M" being an extra on some movies (no IMdB profile, hmm...). Despite the "no assertion of notability" theme, though, these are remotely plausible assertions of notability, and thus not speediable. A pitiful 51 G-hits, 47 non-Wikipedia, and of those, 25 unique. Morgan Wick 04:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — per Morgan Wick. Very few hits on Google, Yahoo!, and MSN. Kalani ^[talk] 06:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete note the article is about two people (one of whom shared a bunk with Chuck Yeager). Dlyons493 Talk 12:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or userfy. This is apparently an autobiographical disambiguation page, created by User:Ken keisel who is presumably one of the two people profiled in this article. Userfying would be appropriate in this case because User:Ken keisel has actually contributed to other articles in the encyclopedia (as opposed to just writing an autobiography). --Metropolitan90 14:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. vanity BookLover 18:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:VAIN Ohconfucius 04:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Move to userpage, and delete, as requested by user on OTRS 2006072310014311. -- Jeandré, 2006-08-13t13:02z
• Move to user page. This person has made a lot of contributions and has no "user" page. He may just not have known how to create one.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ken keisel (talk • contribs) 2006-08-13t17:52:27z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.