Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Evoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, but some of these sources should be cited in the article. W.marsh 20:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ken Evoy

Ken Evoy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This short bio reads like a résumé or perhaps spam. Previously speedy-deleted despite "hangon" tag. ➥the Epopt 23:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Please review the material referenced at Talk:Ken Evoy, which includes reproductions of references in mainstream media. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Soltak | Talk 00:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The information now available in Talk makes an insufficient case for notability per WP:BIO. --Ronz 18:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The article might have some POV and verifiability problems as is, but the guy is clearly notable. See results of the Google search for "Ken Evoy" + interview [1]. Now of course not all these sources are reliable but they clearly show that he meets our requirements of WP:BIO. Pascal.Tesson 21:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

• A strange new meaning of "clearly" I was previously unaware of. --Calton | Talk 01:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Distinctly minor-league stuff, and the references don't change that. --Calton | Talk 01:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per this search giving enough for WP:BIO... Addhoc 20:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.