Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kemo the Blaxican

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete despite the best efforts of the sockmaster trying to disrupt this discussion. There isn't enough third party content for this to stand as a bio. This individual is marginally notable so this can be created if proper sourcing can be found for a new article. Spartaz Humbug! 22:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kemo the Blaxican

Kemo the Blaxican (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not enough notability with the information given, Even though he was a member of a notable rap group, the information of the person himself is not notable; album links to another different artist Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Yo, i b notable, mr. sanchez. please my user name is my LIFE! dont take my LIFE! my page is my LIFE! i b sory mr. sanchez!KemoTheBlaxican (talk) 02:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Pure vandalism. ESanchez, I think you accidentally reverted a good faith edit here.71.203.246.128 (talk) 02:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. TheHallMonitor (talk) 02:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment I find it troubling that the creator/subject's comments have been reverted. No, they were'nt particulary coherent, but he was probably upset and not at his best. Generally, AfD's allow greater lattitude than this. Dlohcierekim 03:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
* Agreed - I restored it above CosmicPenguin (Talk) 04:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Not so: see WP:NOTINHERITED. PKT (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Nope; otherwise, we'd have a page for every member (past and present) of the London Symphony Orchestra. Only those who have some notability beyond their presence in the band--either as a notable solo career, or in some other endeavor--should get their own article. Ig8887 (talk) 16:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Is this retrospective? ie., does this count for articles about band members that already exist (and do not meet the criteria? If so, I have an orgy of AFDs to create. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I would say so...there is no "effective as of" date on the guideline. PKT (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
It should be noted the person posting as Kemo the Blaxican is not the real Kemo. Kemo is one of few Latin rappers who can be accepted rapping in both Spanish and English, getting radio play in both. He also owns his own record company, clothing line and is well respected in the hip hop community. I can not comment on this page being deleted but I will say that Kemo is a good role model for the youth. He stays working and is not one to get in trouble or bring a bad light to himself or the hip hop community. He is notable in both the Latino community and the hip hop community at large for his work ethic and the time he has spent in the game.HHRB (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)HHRB
RE: Dunno if that much of an argument of the page. I mean, some info mentioned but the topic here is if the page is notable enough. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
RE: In the line of work I am in I meet alot of these artists and that is why I said did not want to comment on the delition, but if nothing else maybe it can be merged with Delinquent Habits.HHRB (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)HHRB
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 05:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Do not delete this page, Kemo stands for the latin hip hop community and if this page is deleted it will be based on racist reasons. The world has a right to know of Kemo and his accomplishments and to delete this page would be inhuman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.199.23.229 (talk) 22:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

                      • DO NOT REMOVE KEMO! ==

KEMO THE BLAXICAN DESERVES MORE THAN BEING ON THIS PAGE. HE HAS MORE THAN SET HIS FOOTSTEPS IN THE LATINO HIP HOP GAME, HE HAS PROVED TO EVERYONE THAT THIS MONEY HUNGRY INDUSTRY AND HATERS WILL NOT TAKE HIM DOWN! HE HAS OVERCOME SO MANY STEREOTYPING AND HAS SUCH POWERFUL MESSAGES IN HIS MUSICK, HE IS MORE THAN A POSITIVE ROLE MODEL, HE HELPS OUT HIS PEOPLE IN EVERYTHING THAT HE CAN HELP WITH, GIVING DOWN A HAND AND OFFERING HIS HOME TO PEOPLE IN NEED. HE HAS DONE MORE THAN SHOWS, HE HAS BUILD HIS OWN REALM AND EMPIRE WITH HIS STRONG PERSONALITY AND HIS SOPHISTICATED VOICE. TO THE PEOPLE THAT WANT HIM OUT OF THIS...YOU ARE ONLY EMPOWERING US TO STAND UP FOR A PERSON WHO WE STRONGLY BELIEVE IS A TRUE PIONEER TO SPANGLISH HIP HOP! HE DOESN'T TALK SMACK ABOUT ANYONE, NEVER AIRS OUT DIRTY LAUNDRY AND IS DEFINITELY NOT TRYNG TO GET ANYONE OFF ANYTHING. I FEEL SO SORRY FOR YOU, BUT I CAN SEE THAT HIS LYRICS ARE KILLING YOU! MORE POWER TO KEMO AND HIS PEOPLE THAT WILL MAKE IT PAST THE TOP. DO NOT LISTEN TO THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE THAT JUST MAKE US STRONGER. FROM THE STREETS POINT OF VIEW....PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE KEMO THE BLAXICAN! siefemprefeyfiufunificafamefentefelafalofocafarufucafa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.38.223.251 (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


Wuz up! Why do people want to get Kemo off this page?? It's not his fault the other two members are dum dillies! If anything the name Delinquent habits should be removed, they are the ones that aren't doing anything with the music anymore, no shows, sucky albums and new members that completely change the name and the game their trying to play. I have seen Kemo, he keeps going strong with his bad ass new album and super sick videos, doing shows every week, even his crew is blowing up, Kemo is leaving his tracks on the hip hop hall of fame and he will be in chicano history books as one of the best solo rappers of our time. Haters...Step OFF! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.38.223.251 (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Moved comments but also, note that the comments are from the same person. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.