Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kellogg Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - ulayiti (talk) 18:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kellogg Theory

Delete Basically an empty page, albeit a disputed one. San Saba 17:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Could it be this: http://www.its.caltech.edu/~mjrm/krl_group.htm? This is the only Google reference I can find, and I can't really figure out what's going on there. NickelShoe 21:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

The two are separate. Your link is named due to location of their work (the Kellogg Radiation Laboratory). Monkeyman 22:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, if we can find some verification. You really ought to check page histories before you AfD articles. This article is only practically empty because the original contributor deleted most of it himself until he could make it clearer. NickelShoe 21:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 19:45, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverifiable, only 2 google hits, but those only mention there is a Kellogg theory, and do not provide any supporting information, as far as I know someone could have done up this whole article from scratch as original research and just slapped the Kellogg Theory name on it for respectability --Ruby 22:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Utter nonsense. This is the kind of stuff they brainwash you into cults with. Author was given a chance to source info on back on 3 December 2005 (see talk page). Monkeyman 22:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A theory unifying evolution and gravity? Come on... Obli (Talk) 22:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment: No man, it's real. Just come by one of our meetings. Monkeyman 23:18, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Are you serious? I can't really tell :( Obli (Talk) 17:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Completely joking. I thought my vote would've tipped you.  :) Monkeyman 17:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Whoops, your otherwise noticable icon must have slid to the edge of my scren, I swear it wasn't there before! :) Obli (Talk) 18:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NFT. Stifle 11:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete' OR at its ultimate supreme absolute best. Denni ☯ 02:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.