Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelechava

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:25 (UTC)

[edit] Kelechava

Despite being only 16, he is "one of histories [sic] greatest people, thinkers,lovers, and thinkers". Delete. — P Ingerson (talk) 21:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Google's never heard of him, and the article fails to establish notability. It's been speedied several times in the past; could've been speedied again, IMO. --David Iberri | Talk 21:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: I didn't think to check the deletion logs. And this article looked too long to qualify as an obvious speedy. — P Ingerson (talk) 21:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment Indeed, it doesn't fit any speedy criteria I know of. It isn't non-sensical, so it's just an example of the sort of vanity we wish we could speedy. --Scimitar 22:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Scimitar 22:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delele nn teen vanity. --Etacar11 01:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 03:45, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article is one of Wikipedia's best silliness, vanity, strangeness, and vanity. Created sometime between June 23 and June 25, this article has defined how to be deleted. Eric119 07:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete its obviously random, but funny, clever, and just the sort of thing wikipedia needs unsigned vote from Matthewg123 (talk · contribs) whose only other contribution to Wikipeia was an attempt to vandalise this VfD.
  • Delete. nn vanity. JeremyA 03:38, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete you guys are conservitive ass wipes. when i found this page i was in awe of its hilarity. Another unsigned vote from Matthewg123 (talk · contribs), whose only edits have been to this VfD
  • Delete - vanity, nonsense, minus points for VFD profanity (not to mention tautology in the article) - Skysmith 28 June 2005 10:24 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.