Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keithalmli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Keithalmli

  • Delete This is a vanity page. My first AfD so hope the process is right. cmh 00:36, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This sort of thing should be in User:Keithalmli. Hynca-Hooley 00:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Move page to User:Keithalmli then. —Lifthrasir 00:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Duh. It's the exact same thing. Delete then. —Lifthrasir 00:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per the above. Royboycrashfan 01:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - shameless vanity. Most editors aren't even as vain on their own user page. Check out google for this "notable" 17 year old - [1] Camillus (talk) 01:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
    • It's "AlmLi", but still not notable. --CrypticBacon 04:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
      • Oops - still, a correct search gives mostly blogs and forums, and self-promotion. Camillus (talk) 22:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as above. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 01:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For my own info, would this have been better as a SpeedyDelete? Or was putting it here right? cmh 02:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Putting it here was probably right - there's an assertion of notability there I think, however ridiculous it might be. --kingboyk 02:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Camillus --kingboyk 02:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Textbook vanity page, also already on his user page. --CrypticBacon 04:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Information already contained on userpage, as mentioned above. Non-encyclopædic article.  (aeropagitica)  07:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn, already userfied. -- Samir ∙ TC 07:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity page. - TRDriver 08:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity page. Good AfDing by nom - I think it's always best to AfD whenever an editor isn't sure. MLA 12:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Vanity page. --Siva1979Talk to me 15:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity, nonsense. He's only 17, but he's been around the Internet since it was "invented", circa 1971? ergot 16:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.