Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Rhodes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Keith Rhodes

Claim of Vice President at a company which may meet WP:CORP is assertion of notability, but is impossible to source: only relevant search hit is a self-submitted alumni magazine note which lists him only as an Associate Director, and the company doesn't list him as an officer. Doesn't satisfactorily meet WP:BIO. Also WP:VSCA, as page was created by the subject, User:Keithrhodes. Delete with optional userfy. Kinu t/c 07:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, this vanity article gets a bit too personal. Royboycrashfan 07:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - fat babies are notable? Nobunaga24 07:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn-bio Gu 07:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete doesn't meet WP:BIO Dlyons493 Talk 13:44, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Perhaps notable - but contents of the article only peripherally deals with what actually makes him notable. Celcius 14:04, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn-bio, vanity. --Terence Ong 14:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The only assertion of notability is that they were the heaviest twins yet born in Maryland, which sounds pretty NN to me. ProhibitOnions 16:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.