Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith L. Muth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consenus to delete. Eluchil404 03:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Keith L. Muth

Keith L. Muth (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

contested prod; biography of marginally notable or non-notable individual, minimal coverage by secondary sources, page creator's name suggests possible WP:AUTO Dppowell 05:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Although being a CPA, CFA, and a CFP is certainly unusual, there's not much that's notable about it. There's a smidgen of notability in being in the top 100 of anything, but it's not really enough by itself for an article. --Dhartung | Talk 07:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The article does a poor job of it but notability is buried in there if he was Top 100 Wealth Advisors in the nation as well as numerous media spots. A respectable stub with references is certainly possible even if we don't read about CPA's on the front page. Article needs improving through regular editing. Benjiboi 10:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep based upon the last sentence of the article, "In October 2007, Keith L. Muth was featured in an issue of Worth Magazine as one of the Top 100 Wealth Advisors in the nation." Frog47 15:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Definitely worth keep and clearly notable. Who are the other 99. Could do with a re-write. scope_creep 16:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Dhartung. Certainly nothing here to indicate significant coverage from secondary sources. Doctorfluffy 17:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.