Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Kurson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per A7. Sr13 01:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Keith Kurson

Keith Kurson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Speedy and prod removed by author, procedurally sending to AFD. Article is about the admin of a site who is involved with a feud with the "chans". Website does not appear to be notable enough for Wikipedia in itsself, and all external link are either to one of the "chans", or a site for "People Who Suck", none which are reliable sources. Wildthing61476 12:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete No real notability asserted. Take the forum drama somewhere else. DarkAudit 15:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete as nn "feud", possible vanity too. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 17:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Not notable at all - Myanw 11:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Not notable. Just a passing chan invasion fad. Cowicide 07:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Not notable. Feeding a megalomaniac more attention is not one of Wikipedia's functions. ThisIsRealPuma 14:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong and Speedy Delete The page is OBVIOUSLY made by someone who hates Subeta and wants to bash Keith, as it can be seen from the fact that the page is almost ENTIRELY composed of cricitism.70.83.179.43 00:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.