Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Jorgensen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 16:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Keith Jorgensen

Keith Jorgensen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This person does not appear to meet the notability criteria; prod removed by creator FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

*Delete no sign of notability. Doesn't even mention the award winning company he supposedly created. Or is "award winning" refering to youth awards he won in the 70's? Improbcat 17:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC) :*Weak Keep I light of major changes to the article I'm changing my vote. Needs wikification, and references but now looks like an article that might go somewhere. Improbcat 19:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I'm reverting my vote (yes again), given the authors failure to add any source, and failure to answer my question on his talk page regarding possible COI. Improbcat 15:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The article was not to be submitted in that form. It was grossly incomplete. I have updated the article to include both items you referred as missing, as well as the rest of the article. Sorry for the confusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kejsport (talk • contribs) 19:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete None of his accomplishments seem to be verifiable. The Chicago Youth Film Festival may exist, although I can't find proof of that anywhere, but it hasn't any established notability, and WP:NOTE calls him notable only if "The person has received significant recognized awards or honors." A minor, local youth film festival shouldn't qualify. He also isn't notable because he "worked on" major films; lots of people pushed mops on the Star Wars set, but they aren't notable. The main criteria under the notability guideline for people require:

• The person must have been the subject of published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.
  

Please read WP:BIO and WP:AB before trying to re-create this page. While this person may achieve notability someday (googling him brings up a myspace page calling him only 28; dude's got lots of career ahead of him), he doesn't seem to have reached the bar yet. Deltopia 19:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete: for Notability. I looked for secondary sources and came up with promotional material. I've added the {{unreferenced}} template to the article twice now, hoping to get at least one reliable secondary source from the author. This appears to be a vanity autobiography, although the author hasn't answered that question on his talk page. Toddstreat1 15:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment Original author is the subject of article. He acknowledges unknowingly violating COI with the article. Improbcat 19:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.