Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 02:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Keith_(band)

Non-notable Mcarlin 10:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. Non-notable. doktorb | words 11:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete They don't seem to pass WP:MUSIC. GassyGuy 13:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This is a good article, better than a ton of craptastically written band articles on Wikipedia. In addition, I fine at least three reviews online of the band and/or their newest album [1],[2], [3]. One of these reviews [4] says "Keith have produced one of the citys best records so far this year". I think this article is a keeper, Wikipedia could do alot worse. DrunkenSmurf 17:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. Non-notable, per Doktorbuk - Johntex\^talk 02:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.