Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keir Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfy. W.marsh 18:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Keir Johnson

This page is far to brief and is likely a vanity page Wootonius 18:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete I restored the article to a pre-vandalized version which has more information about the subject, but I think he still doesn't reach encyclopedia-level notability. --Ed (Edgar181) 19:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Yeah, we could reclassify as a stub I suppose --Wootonius 19:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep, on the condition the word "Keir" is replaced throughout with "Johnson." --The Editrix 20:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Just for the rape of bolding too much text. =D --mboverload@ 20:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-06-22 08:24Z
• Userfy, just doesn't seem to be notable yet. feydey 08:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.