Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazuhide Uekusa

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:04, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kazuhide Uekusa

The article which hurt his honor. For the same reason, deletion request nominated and deleted on ja.wikipedia. (Sorry, I cannot write English well.) -- Lusheeta 11:14, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• (Delete) In addition two redirect pages || Eronomist and Tekagamist.Toyoda 12:18, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Japanese peeping-toms aren't necessarily notable--nixie 14:17, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Voyeuristic Professor. Much more notable than most economics professors. Klonimus 03:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep, as it seems he was known as an economist before this "incident". The article should probably focus more on his professional and academic accomplishments, though. / Uppland 20:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Based on the evidence available in the article, his academic career was not independently notable either. I see no evidence that he passes the recommended "average professor" test. Delete unless further evidence is presented. Rossami (talk) 22:53, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN. -Casito⇝Talk 23:34, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 04:41, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, since he was a professor and a TV commentator and I'd vote keep in any other circumstances. Agree with Uppland about focus, the peeping thing could be one line. Kappa 05:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment/question: one of the linked articles calls him "a well-known economist who was a regularly featured guest on television programs". Is this just a tabloidy exaggeration? He was also a professor at what appears to be a very prestigious university (with the obvious reservations that I know nothing about Japanese universities, and on Wikipedia all universities are prestigious). That the article contains less flattering information is not a reason to delete if he is reasonably notable for other reasons. Uppland 05:58, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Waseda is definitely an "Ivy League" equivalent. Kappa 19:05, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki, belongs in Wikinews. Radiant_* 07:42, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
  • Wikinews is public domain and Wikipedia is GFDL, therefore it is not possible to legally transwiki from here to there. In any case, this news is almost a month old. ☺ Uncle G 23:52, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)
• Keep. When it is translated into English it will be a nice article that sheds light on Japanese culture. --Zero 15:21, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.