Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural keep, given ArbCom injunction on deleting such material. WjBscribe 03:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives)

Kayla Huntington (Desperate Housewives) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) No real world context, fails WP:FICT.--The Dominator (talk) 07:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

*Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.--The Dominator (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, fictional character not notable outside of their own fictional universe. Lankiveil ^{(complaints | disco)} 07:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC).
• Redirect to List of Desperate Housewives characters per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Mayfair. That AfD redirected "Kayla Huntington". Note: the author has also broken at least one other redirect from that AfD. • Gene93k (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep A violation of Halt to activities. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

• Perhaps I'm reading this incorrectly, but isn't this only a proposed decision? And there's only four supporters where there should be seven for a decision to be accepted? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC) Didn't read the small print, was looking at the overall description. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

• Begrudged Speedy Keep per Col. Warden. JuJube (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per Colonel Warden, though under normal circumstances, I'd pursue deletion with the article having nothing but in-universe information. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep at least for the duration of the arbitration case as per the injunction at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Proposed decision#Halt to activities. Davewild (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep due to an ArbCom injunction. Though normally I would vote to delete. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.