Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kay v. Lambeth LBC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - citations establishing its significance added during AfD process - Yomangani^talk 11:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kay v. Lambeth LBC

This case does not establish why it is important. There is no comment about precedence or much evidence of coverage. As far as I can see there are three reasons for including a legal case on wikipedia - (1) it sets an important legal precedent, (2) it generates media interest or (3) it involves a notable party and has a profound influence on that party. This article on its face doesn't meet any of the three criteria.

• Delete per nom--Jusjih 14:39, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• This and this will tell you the significance of the case. Note that this is a case that was decided by the Law Lords, the supreme court of the United Kingdom. Uncle G 15:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

OK. Nomination withdrawn JASpencer 15:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per Uncle G's rationale above. GRBerry 02:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.