Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kawa no dansu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 04:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kawa no dansu

Kawa no dansu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable - I just got 35 ghits and worse one of them (although in the summary it looked like a copyvio) was, when I followed the link, a page on a type of dog breed. There is no information in the page on who founded the art, when and who practices it. The original authors only other contribution is to a High School page which makes me have all sorts of deep dark thoughts. Peter Rehse 02:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions. —Peter Rehse 02:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete - Cant find anything on google on a quoted search - Non-notable until proven otherwise! Corpx 02:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Also note that it has equally few GHits in Japanese, none of them relevant, either. [1][2] cab 02:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I've searched google, and haven't found anything. I've searched some online martial arts indexes and haven't found anything. I'm assuming that this martial art is either terribly obscure or completely made up. Calgary 02:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as probable hoax. Bucketsofg 03:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as likely hoax. I found one ghit that didn't contain this same text. Bart133 (t) (c) 04:12, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom Harlowraman 05:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. "Riverdance". Ha ha, very funny. Zetawoof(ζ) 06:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment Ogh God (slaps forehead) I am sooo thick some times.Peter Rehse 06:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • speedy delete Ve haf no humour.Peter Rehse 06:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete hoax, is it appropriate to add a speedy tag after an AfD is already under way? if do do it.--Nate1481( t/c) 09:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
    • It wouldn't stick; there isn't a CSD that applies to hoaxes. ("Patent nonsense" only applies to articles which make no sense at all.) Zetawoof(ζ) 10:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Even if it were real (which I doubt), it would not merit an article. Fg2 10:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as WP:SNOW. Morgan Wick 18:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Nominate for BJAODN -- llywrch 22:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.