Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaura
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I will gladly give a copy upon request. Sr13 03:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kaura
WP:NOT the place to promote upstart and non-notable bands Misterdiscreet 20:31, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Irk(talk) 00:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:MUSIC. Wikipedia is not a place to establish notability. Tdmg 02:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete but very nicely written article on non-notable band that may someday be notable, at which time an article would be needed. Didn't win any award or competition or other notability guidelines. With more albums, it does have potential. Good luck, band! Fineday 03:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- I just looked and saw that the first author of the article wasn't notified. That is not nice. Would the deleting administrator kindly allow at least that person to respond or let him/her know that the article is in jeopardy and, if necessary and possible, correct the article? Fineday 03:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- It seems that Sagedrummer doesn't edit much. If the deleting adminstrator wants me to look after the article, I am willing to look after it for 30 days and relist it for deletion on August 1, 2007 (so that some of the contributing editors will have a chance to look and see the deletion tag).Fineday 03:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- It may be courteous to notify an author, but it is not a requirement for AFD. This isn't an article that needs "looking after", it needs sources demonstrating notability or passage of WP:BAND, and while they apparently have some interesting friends and may well be notable in the near future, they aren't yet. --Dhartung | Talk 19:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- It seems that Sagedrummer doesn't edit much. If the deleting adminstrator wants me to look after the article, I am willing to look after it for 30 days and relist it for deletion on August 1, 2007 (so that some of the contributing editors will have a chance to look and see the deletion tag).Fineday 03:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I just looked and saw that the first author of the article wasn't notified. That is not nice. Would the deleting administrator kindly allow at least that person to respond or let him/her know that the article is in jeopardy and, if necessary and possible, correct the article? Fineday 03:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:BAND as of this time. --Dhartung | Talk 19:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
