The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was early close, keep. While egregious copyright violations qualify for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G12, this article does not. Since the only stated concern behind this nomination has been addressed, I am closing it as a keep. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
egregious copyright violations in article Will(talk) 21:47, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment I removed one paragraph which was a copyvio. Haven't found the rest on Google - there is probably enough left for a valid stub. Iain99 21:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.