Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katrina genocide

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 23:18, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Katrina genocide

Neologism, highly POV, personal research. --InShaneee 16:53, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Unencylopedic (POV, personal research, etc). --Commander Keane 17:39, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
• delete as per nom. Title is hopelessly POV. Roodog2k (talk) 17:45, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't even research; research is usually backed up by some evidence. --Quintin3265 18:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Term is being used by multiple sources as shown in the google search. Benjamin Gatti 18:10, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Just because someone uses hyperbole doesn't mean we have to make an article about it. Sdedeo 18:30, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, POV neologism and attack page. Christopher Parham (talk) 18:49, 2005 September 9 (UTC)
• Delete, rant. Zoe 21:03, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Benjamin, seriously. · Katefan0^(scribble) 21:39, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete' no kidding. Dottore So 23:42, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Irretrievably POV. Capitalistroadster 00:49, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. Not in significant real use. A belief system that is not held by enough people to be of encyclopedic importance as a belief system. One of the two references does not even use the term "Katrina genocide." The second is a link to a Google search, but not a search on the phrase "Katrina genocide." For example, one of the hits is to a church website which has one section urging parishioners to assist victims of Hurricane Katrina and another section about a petition to stop genocide in Darfur. When we search on the exact phrase there are only 10 displayed hits (and 54 more which are "very similar"). Dpbsmith (talk) 01:07, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm sure Brown spent months in his basement planning the hurricane, too. Hopelessly POV. 23skidoo 02:49, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I tried to edit it to make it at less racist, but its very premise is blatantly POV. A few websites that contain the term means nothing; we could have an article on the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race with the same evidence.Schizobullet 4:32, 10 September 2005
• Delete. Oh my. Marskell 14:38, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The original author appears to have been writing in anger; better judgement suggests reserving "genocide" for purposeful very large scale ethnic murder.---CH (talk) 18:30, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Plenty of reasons listed above.--Carabinieri 20:40, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No argument. siafu 05:58, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.