Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katies-World

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Katies-World

Brief article on a pornography website. Article has an Alexa rating of 138 thousand. Although there are large fluctuations in the Alexa reading, it appears that the site has not breached the 50,000 mark in the past two years. Google has 267 uniques from, 1280 results, when searching for references to the site excluding the site itself, the majority of the high results appear to be broken referral pages and forum posts, degenerating into linkfarming. No evidence of newsworthy hits in Google News. In addition the website appears to fail the WP:WEB criteria, as it is externally unverifiable, and the site or model appear to have won no awards -- Saberwyn 09:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: Before anyone accuses me of blindly following the Freeones deletion listed today. I will declare that I came across this article in Category:Adult websites, when trying to gauge the level of 'notability' a pornographic website (in the case of my search, Freeones) should have to be included. This article, from the few I looked at, was so far below the bar for inclusion per WP:WEB, I decided to nominate it. -- Saberwyn 09:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. MadCow257 16:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Nathcer 22:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom (and Alexa rank in particular) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.