Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Deyerle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 05:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Katie Deyerle

Katie Deyerle (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: Definitely see the assertion of notability, but do not believe this article meets WP:BIO. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Archery may not be the most popular sport but World Champion and World Record holder easily meet "competed at highest amateur level". Has enough coverage present to substantiate the claim to athletic notability. Horrorshowj (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Junior world record holder, but of an obscure sporting event. Notable, at least within that community. --lk (talk) 06:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete- Article is too weak in general and the fact she is an ametuer world record holder isn't good enough. I know a guy who is the world record holder for paper clips in his mouth but I wouldn't list it here.---Iconoclast Horizon 13:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment- She holds the 'world record' in the junior amatuer division for her class, not an overall world record of anything susbstantial.---Iconoclast Horizon 13:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete junior amateur record. JJL (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment It was nice of her, though, to take out the stuff about her new puppy and the wonderful guy she is dating and where he works. But that is still on all of the mirror sites out there.---Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.