Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Tierney Roberts

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted

[edit] Kathryn Tierney Roberts

Plain vanity. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 18:05, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete this page and the link on Kathryn (name). — RJH 18:41, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I would vote for a delete, but there's no point. Smoddy, thanks for your civility and open mind, but I happen to know that this article is nothing but Urban Dictionary-esque banter. The guy who made it often shows me these pages (he is not the same as the "Ultimate Ninja" vandal) he makes about our classmates. I usually give them a dismissive sigh and a roll of my eyes, assuming Wikipedians will soon root them out, which has always happened until now. You are a more patient person than I, but your recommended solution is right on the mark. I will carry through with that now... but don't be surprised if in the future, this person merits a real article. Kathryn's a lovely girl who will go far in life, but for now she's nothing to write a Wikipedia article about. Much love, BDD 02:32, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• well, if you know the guy creating these articles, maybe you could ask him to kindly knock it off. Sure, wikipedians will eventually find and delete it, but we all have much better things to do. Secondly, I'd like to point out that the "VfD" notice specifically says "do not blank this article" so I've just reverted it back to the original. I'm sure you were just trying to help, but the VfD stuff is one of the few "serious" policies around here. The article is seems to qualify for speedy, so I've also just tagged & listed it as such. Soundguy99 03:25, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I... er... I really suck at a lot of Wikipedia's technical aspects. I thought I could delete the article. Sorry about that. Just consider mine a firm delete. And don't worry, Soundguy, I have told this guy to stop before, but he happens to basically be my best friend; you'll have to forgive me if I allow other Wikipedians to axe his work regularly. --BDD 03:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Well, hell, then you can just sneak into his room when he's asleep and whisper subliminal messages into his ear. . . . "stopwritingdumbWikipediaarticlesstopwritingdumbWikipediaarticlesstopwritingdumbWikipediaarticles."  ;-) Sorry if I sounded cranky. As far as the "technical aspects", hey, no worries. Like I said, I figured you meant well. In fact I might be wrong about this meeting the speedy deletion criteria. I guess we'll find out. Soundguy99 06:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete in case it doesn't get speedied (it's currently a candidate). --Angr/_comhrá 06:02, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.