Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathie-Ann Joseph

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. fulfils notability cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kathie-Ann Joseph

Kathie-Ann Joseph (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:BIO. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to columbiasurgery.org. possible copyvio http://www.columbiasurgery.org/about/dir_staff.html. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 07:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 23:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 02:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. Medline finds around 18 papers for "KA Joseph" which appear to be her; Google Scholar finds three with at least 20 citations. She is featured in Crain's New York Business [1] as well as Fox News.com [2] and (according to her CV) New York Moves Magazine. I believe she narrowly fails WP:PROF at this time. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Maybe doesn't get through WP:PROF, but the Crain's and Fox News sources make her notable on general WP:N and WP:BIO criteria. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep as perhaps a notable clinician. I am not sure all the mentions of her listed are substantial--the Crains one is not actually referenced. 00:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.