Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kateryna Leonchenkova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kateryna Leonchenkova

Kateryna Leonchenkova (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable individual. Lexicon (talk) 15:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, pending references. rxnd ( t | € | c ) 15:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non notable individual and no external sources. HOWEVER if editor in question can produce an article that establishes notablity and sourcing, then it will be weak keep. Quatreryukami 15:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as above. I bet "speaking to people about the dangers of wells" is great fun though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, NN as the text says. Pavel Vozenilek 07:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, Vanity page, this individual is of no particular importance in Brampton, Ontario--I'm a resident, and the library's newspaper database scans as no results for the name. And the events are fictionalized. Brampton is on a flood plain & thusly unable to use well-water.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.95.146.252 (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC).
• Delete, unless someone shows that there are sources out there that I haven't found. Google and Google News know nothing about anyone named Kateryna Leonchenkova, or a Brampton Award for Civic Bravery, the article for which was created by the same user. That page links to Brampton's home page as a reference, but searching it for "bravery" comes up only with an award, not named that, that seems to have been a one-time thing and wasn't given to Kateryna Leonchenkova. I'd think both these page were just simple hoaxes and be unconditionally in favor of their deletion except for one thing: user Scott1313's other contributions all seem quite reasonable, making me think it less likely that he would create two pages that were complete fiction. Pinball22 16:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.