The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. I was wavering over whether to relist or just close as delete, then I actually read the article. It's a blatant hoax, and even includes some old-time not-very-funny jokes presented as fact. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 09:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Non notable, 1 google hit, low alexa traffic rank.--Dakota?e 06:47, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete. non notable, 1 is no googles, 1 4-4 alexa.--Dakota?e 06:50, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete, unverifiable. Probably not true. Punkmorten 16:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.