Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karunakara Guru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 09:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Karunakara Guru, Santhigiri ashram

Promotional article for leader of what appears to be a very minor religion. Tagged for cleanup, neutrality and accuracy, and nothing done. Santhigiri ashram is a Geogre's Law failure, scores only about 800 Google hits, mostly to its own self-promotion. I see no evidence that this is a major or even significant religion, although of course it is quite possible that the problems verifying might be down to systemic bias. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 13:21, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

It is not a new relegion. He is a Hindu relegious_leader/guru/saint. Tintin Talk 14:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. --King of All the Franks 13:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I like when you do Newpage patrol the same time I do, JzG.  RasputinAXP  _{talk contribs} 13:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Needs cleanup The article should be cleaned -- Kjrajesh.
• Comment. The article K. R. Narayanan mentions them. I am not sure about the notability, so no vote yet. utcursch | talk 08:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Benefit of doubt. Needs to cleaned up, the hagiographic tone changed and the size cut down drastically. Tintin Talk 14:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.