Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karuna Institute

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 03:14, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Karuna Institute

No potential to become encyopedic appears to be an add anywayGeni 12:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. I think you've misread this. This institute offers professional qualifications in psychotherapy accredited by the United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy (which is one of two independent national accreditation bodies recognised for psychotherapists used by the UK National Health Service) and masters degrees accredited by Middlesex University. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I created the article. While I am an ex Karuna student (91-95), it can in no way be considered an ad as I have completely lost connection with them, and they are, anyway, a charitable institute, which is one of the reasons I had no hesitation in starting the article. The Institute is clearly notable, it is a nationally recognised training institute for psychotherapy (one of only 2 for transpersonal psychology) and craniosacral therapy as well. Both Maura Sills and Franklyn Sills clearly each deserve an article (perhaps now is the time to start). While I have felt it is a shame that no-one else (ex students etc) has added to this article it clearly has a vast potential as an article. The buddhist psychotherapy work they are doing is certainly unique in the UK and possibly the world. Why would anyone think this article is not encyclopedic. There must be thousands of articles more deserving of a Vfd than this one, --SqueakBox 14:31, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep -- Longhair | Talk 18:30, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep tertiary institutions. Capitalistroadster 19:59, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Edumacation. -- BD2412 ^talk 22:59, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
• Keep all tertiary educational institutions. Kelly Martin 02:48, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and expand. Notable institute. Megan1967 06:01, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.