Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karmøy Unge høyre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Karmøy Unge høyre

Untranslated at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English for two weeks. Discussion from there follows. No vote. Kusma (討論) 05:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Swedish? No idea what it's about! Tonywalton  | Talk 13:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Not Swedish - it's Norwegian. It's about the Karmøy branch of a political group (party?) called Rogaland Unge Høyres, which I think means 'Rogaland Young Rights' (Right vs Left, not rights vs duties). I may have Unge wrong though - I wonder if it might not be 'New Rights' (like German 'Jungendstil' for 'Art Nouveau'.

It says KUH is the third largest branch of RUH, and lists its officers. Probably not notable on its own, but should maybe form part of a RUH article, ColinFine 13:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it's in Norwegian, and about the local chapter of Unge Høyre ("Young right", not 'new'), the youth organization of Høyre. It's basically a short blurb on how they're the largest political youth organization in north Rogeland (see? you can always be the best with enough qualifiers!) who are fighting for diversity and equality, and then a list of the board members. Given that the Unge Høyre doesn't have an article (just a single paragraph in the one for Høyre), I don't think this warrants its own page. It's vanity. --BluePlatypus 02:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Untranslated after the required period. eople with a better knowledge have told us above that if it was in English, it wouldn't meet our notability standards. Capitalistroadster 05:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. --Kinu 06:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. I can read it and verify that it's not noteable at all. Amphis 07:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all these people who speak Norwegian (OK, so it's not Swedish!) Tonywalton  | Talk 11:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable whatsoever. Norwegian language riddled with spelling errors. Punkmorten 17:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Avi 18:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, if it was worthwhile someone would have translated it by now. Stifle 23:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.