Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KarlSchererRevisited7

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:30, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wire-and-string puzzle

Sorry about this, but Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer ended with no consensus, due to many people voting to keep simply because they didn't want to vote on all the articles listed at once, so now they are listed seperately. This is the VfD for

• Wire-and-string puzzle

For the reason to delete this article, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer

• Delete ~~~~ 00:50, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, or merge (unless the puzzle article is too large). Reword categories to be less authoritative. Slike2 01:17, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with mechanical puzzle (or disentanglement puzzle, if kept). -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:27, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with the rest, under whichever title makes the most sense. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:15, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Mechanical puzzle. JamesBurns 09:37, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This series of articles is O.R., and there's no value in redirecting one to the other. -Harmil 15:48, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into disentanglement puzzle (or mechanical puzzle, if disentanglement puzzle ends up being merged into that). To save -Ril- time, I have 80 prior edits. Chuck 18:19, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to disentanglement puzzle. -- Lochaber 14:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to disentanglement puzzle. --Bambaiah 11:07, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep (or merge) linas 15:24, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and I don't think this should be merged as this a totally different kind of puzzle than a mechanical puzzle. --R.Koot 16:06, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep A completely different problem: topology, not affine displacement. Septentrionalis 17:31, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep— Paul August ☎ 17:49, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Stop listing these things for deletion and take up merge/redirect issues at Wikipedia:WikiProject Games instead. - dcljr (talk) 21:18, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep --Laura Scudder | Talk 23:23, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Salsb 01:53, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per all above. Karol 06:22, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Count Iblis 21:12, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

user has 66 prior edits ~~~~ 21:30, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

I have a large number of edits from the time before I made my user account. I have started a number of high quality scientific pages here. Quality (i.e. starting or contributing to high quality pages) not quantity (chatting on talk pages) should count. Count Iblis 22:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Then sign here when logged out, so that it proves your statement that you are the same as the IP that made those edits. ~~~~ 13:00, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

I wouldn't waste time trying to convince -Ril- you're not a sockpuppet. The admins around here are generally smart enough to distinguish the real sockpuppets from legitimate contributors who haven't been around for long. If I were worried about being discounted as a sockpuppet, I wouldn't have posted my own number of edits. Chuck 17:23, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.