Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kardos Empire/Kingdom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE.

[edit] Kardos Empire/Kingdom, Kardos Kingdom, Principality of Sodrak

Just another nn micronation. Delete JeremyA 2 July 2005 19:45 (UTC)

  • You gotta love that flag, could they not come up with anything more original? Delete -- Francs2000 | Talk 2 July 2005 19:48 (UTC)
  • I've added a duplicate of this page (Kardos Kingdom) to the page, and I also vote for DELETION. -- Cabhan 2 July 2005 20:42 (UTC)
  • Dudtz-Keep both pages. does it bother you that I want a nation
  • "ImperialSocialistConstitutional Monarchy" in Pennsylvania? This article should have a {{nonsense}} template inserted. ‡ Jarlaxle July 2, 2005 22:26 (UTC)
  • Delete, WP:VAIN. Radiant_>|< July 2, 2005 22:39 (UTC)
    • Actually we used sense when we wrote up the constitution. quit being like Geoge W Bush —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dudtz (talk • contribs) 2 July, 2005 22:49 (UTC)
  • Peter Panda-KEEP theres nothing wrong with these pages. Is it really bothering you people that much
  • BJAODN. For obvious reasons as fictional, unrecognised countries. -- Natalinasmpf 2 July 2005 23:29 (UTC)
  • Delete. Go outside, it's nice out. Dcarrano July 3, 2005 00:18 (UTC)
  • Delete all. Vanity micronationcruft. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL July 3, 2005 00:24 (UTC)
  • Delete Ditto User:Android79. If Kardos ever comes up with something tangeable, perhaps I'll eat my hat L-Bit 3 July 2005 00:37 (UTC)
  • No sources cited. No evidence at all that any such things exist. Unverifiable. And Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Delete. Uncle G 2005-07-03 03:57:24 (UTC)
  • Delete, just delete... Cyclone49 3 July 2005 04:04 (UTC)
  • I had similar fantasies when I was ten or so (but I think my spelling was better). Delete the lot. -- Hoary July 3, 2005 06:42 (UTC)
  • Delete per Uncle G. -- Ricky81682 (talk) July 3, 2005 09:45 (UTC)

Dudtz-I assume you feel the same way about the Def-facto independent country of Chechnya,prehaps you should delate it if that is your stance on nations of these types. I am of noble blood I did not create this nation by my self We have atlest 33 members I amphibious landing craft A newspaper company atleast 33 vehicles more than 15 properties. Here a link you might find useful http://nobility.artsakhworld.com/Atabekian_Kings_List_Eng.html Look under The Haykazuni dynasty

  • Clarification: Unnotable, fails Google test ("Kardos Kingdom" results in 0 results, "Jeff Kardos" results in 3, none of which relating to said Kingdom). As far as your Chechnya example, Chechnya is quite notable. Yours is not. You are the weakest link, goodbye. -- Cabhan 3 July 2005 16:12 (UTC)

Dudtz:well try this one http://www.houseofnames.com/coatofarms_details.asp?sId=&s=fulton http://www.houseofnames.com/coatofarms_details.asp?sId=&s=turnbaugh and besides there is no weakest link becuse it is a steel cable covered in sythetic diamond film with a reflective coating

Comment. You want to use your "noble blood" to cheat your way into an encylopedia? Well be warned, ye elitist aristocratic scum! I could careless about your bloodline, because perhaps you never heard of egalitarianism and meritocracy have you? As for diamond, it's not particularly tensile: it may be hard, but spider silk is probably more flexible and stronger than diamond, as well. Just not particularly hard. Vehicles? Are those something like metro trains, or if I'm guessing correctly, they are just bourgeois elements of hoarding and inefficiency. -- Natalinasmpf 3 July 2005 19:01 (UTC)

  • I didn't plan to "cheat"

Constitutional monarchies also have merit systems, idiot.

Yes, but the fact is, you assert your authority based on your nobility, and that disqualifies your so called "nation" as a meritocracy. -- Natalinasmpf 4 July 2005 05:33 (UTC)
  • Comment: Okay, so you have a family crest. I don't care, many people have such crests. The fact is, your little Kardos Kingdom is a farce and there is no reference to it anywhere. It is inherently unnotable, and therefore, has no place in Wikipedia. -- Cabhan 3 July 2005 23:42 (UTC)

Dudtz:thats why I am trying to create a referance here how many people do you know have them

You really should see Wikipedia:No original research. Your claims has to be verified. -- Natalinasmpf 4 July 2005 05:33 (UTC)
It wouldn't be a reference (or "referance"), Dudtz; it would just be pointless publicity for your little fantasy, of no interest to anybody aside from you and perhaps a handful of your chums.Of course, you are entitled to argue against this view here; but if you do so, please sign your comments. This is easy: just hit the ~ key four times in a row. Thank you. -- Hoary July 4, 2005 02:37 (UTC)
  • Delete all. non notable micronation cruft. JamesBurns 4 July 2005 01:59 (UTC)
  • Delete - Micronation with a capital "somewhere" inside a subdivision of a large nation. --WCFrancis 4 July 2005 06:21 (UTC)
  • Delete - another micronation. Well, I am going to miss that flag!! Oliver Keenan July 4, 2005 22:20 (UTC)
  • This is plainly vanity nonsense. Speedy. -Hmib 5 July 2005 16:57 (UTC)
  • Dudtz:my aurtority is given to me by the people
    • Dudtz, old bean, you'll look more authoritative when you manage to get the spelling of "authority" right. Incidentally, is the little chore (considerately explained above) of signing and dating messages still beyond you? -- Hoary July 8, 2005 06:23 (UTC)
  • DELETE! Why is this still here? -Hmib 8 July 2005 04:18 (UTC)
  • Dudtz-Why are you still here? 8 july 2005 17:55
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.