Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karazhan Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Anyone interested in merging the material, don't hesitate to contact my & I can userify this article. — Scientizzle 15:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Karazhan Tower

Karazhan Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Pure game guide material, an AFD discussion last year concluded that articles on instance dungeons in World of Warcraft were non-encyclopedic, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadmines. Stormie 02:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

• Merge after drastic chopping with Instance (World of Warcraft) as per suggestion. I'm sure someone would be interested in this being posted somewhere in its entirety, just not Wikipedia, where it's WoWcruft. Accounting4Taste 03:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, like most WoW-related topics, this is covered better on WoWWiki, see [1]. --Stormie 08:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Unencyclopedic, gamecruft. Keb25 04:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Keb25. Open to merge/redirect if desired. Stifle (talk) 16:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of science fiction & fantasy deletions.--Gavin Collins 21:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Merge as per Accounting4Taste's suggestion. BeoHF 22:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. An "instanced dungeon" is not going to become notable. --Gavin Collins 04:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.