Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapla (disambiguation)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 08:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kapla (disambiguation)
Delete.No reason to have this. Per WP:D, "A disambiguation page is not a list of dictionary definitions," not to mention it's a non-English fictional word... Tan | 39 05:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Dictionary definition? :) Kill the disambiguation and leave it with the article at the top of the list. PeterSymonds | talk 05:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; no evidence that the Klingon word is notable, and dab pages aren't for dicdefs anyway. A redirect would serve no purpose, as nobody's likely to type (disambiguation) in. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 05:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. The Klingon word for success (used as a farewell) is Qapla’, anyway. --Dhartung | Talk 07:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, I created the page, and I'm not sure what I was thinking at the time. (I have seen it written as Kapla, however...guess I'm not a big enough Trekkie to spell it in the "original Klingon." ;) Anyway, fair enough. Kill it off. - Ageekgal (talk) 14:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as this page should have had the klingon word entry rm from the page as a non-article entry (or dictionary def, take your pick), then speedied as a dab page with only one valid entry. -Gwguffey (talk) 15:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Comment To be sure, we could (if this were Qapla) say Qapla, a word for success in the Klingon language, which would point the reader to encyclopedic content (the word is mentioned in the article). Right now that's a redirect and not a disambiguation page. Or if the Klingon Wikipedia were still active (and had an article) we could interwiki .... --Dhartung | Talk 02:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.