Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamsha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kamsha

Kamsha (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism. WP:NOT a dictionary, or for publicising neologisms. Mr Stephen 10:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, it's too incoherent for a neologism, I'd almost classify this as patent nonsense. No Google references to indicate that this is in widespread usage. Lankiveil 10:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
• Delete agree with Lankiveil. Note that Hussam1987 is vandal-only account. --Bear and Dragon 11:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Google search found 14500 finds, mostly as a surname, nothing about Arabic. Likeliest a hoax. Anthony Appleyard 15:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination--Shrike 17:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Doczilla 17:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Unintelligible/Original research. --Infrangible 02:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone else. Acalamari 18:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as soon as possible, not original research, but nonsense and hoax.— JyriL ^talk 23:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.