Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kambarasam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to C. N. Annadurai. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-24 10:16Z

[edit] Kambarasam

Kambarasam (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability. Books are not inherently notable and this does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability for books Hnsampat 12:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. cab 00:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - I'd say that association with C. N. Annadurai and importance in the pro-Dravidian Self-respect movement seems to grant notability. Google Books hits show that there are published works about it [1], which would begin to satisfy notability for books. Smmurphy(Talk) 05:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Cleanup. The article is poorly-written, but the book seems to be somewhat notable. It has been mentioned in several other works[2]. A search with alternative spelling Kamba Rasam also shows some notability[3][4]. A merge and redirect to C. N. Annadurai is another option. utcursch | talk 14:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with C. N. Annadurai. Realkyhick 20:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - per utcursch.Bakaman 23:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. Appears to be a malicious propaganda material against Dravidian leaders. Anwar 16:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)*
  • merge and redirect to Annadurai, the author. The article now has some serious NPOV problems.--killing sparrows 16:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and Redirect in the short-term since the article is so terrible. When someone can write a decent stub with reliable source on it, I'll change to keep. GizzaChat © 05:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.