Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaleido360

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. The JPS^{talk to me} 16:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kaleido360

Kaleido360 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Technically it asserts notability, but the website only went online a few days ago. WP:WEB and WP:CRYSTAL. Alksub 00:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a blog to host information about the construction and HTML code added to a website. Useight 00:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Mostly per WP:CBALL. Also, very little context. Give it some time, and it should be more notable and meet WP's guidelines. - Rjd0060 01:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Until this "revolutionary" technology comes out, the site is non-notable. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 ^{My Talk} _{Sign Here!} 01:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable crystal ballery. Almost speediable. Bfigura ^(talk) 01:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per WP:NOT#BLOG and WP:NOT#CBALL. Notability is also questionable. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) (review) 11:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT#BLOG and WP:NOT#CBALL. Thunderwing 14:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Take your pick--either A7 (no notability to speak of) or G11 (the article as written stinks of spam). Blueboy96 16:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.