Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaith

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 04:56, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kaith

More self promotion/spam from User:Baoutrust. See also: [1]. In fact, User:Baoutrust appears to be Katerina Theohari based on the user's edits. —RaD Man (talk) 23:37, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as vanity in the extreme. hfool/Wazzup? 03:05, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. When painters or musicians start writing about their influences in a short article, it usually means "not-notable in the extreme". Wyss 03:19, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable, vanity. Ливай | ☺ 03:46, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: promo, vanity, no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:17, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Self-promotion by Katerina Theohari-Smith. --MarkSweep 10:08, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. promo, vanity, non-notable, self-submission. --kooo 11:23, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Agree with Kooo and others above. GRider\^talk 18:55, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity, not notable. Somebody in the WWW 07:21, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Nuke It  ALKIVAR™ 05:44, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Spam. Jayjg | (Talk) 18:11, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. --Godric 23:35, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, and her paintings are more fuzzy rather than impressionist anyway. hfool/Roast me 23:34, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.