Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaaos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 21:06, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kaaos

Band Vanity. almost no information. I suggest a Speedy but I thought I'd take it here. Pufferfish101 17:23, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • delete -- Jwinters | Talk 18:17, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Qualifies as a speedy under Case 1. Delete either way. Chris 20:46, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep bands who made albums an LP in the 1980's which is being re-released now. Kappa 03:54, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Guidelines at WikiProject Music require 2 alba. Chris 20:57, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • I count a re-release as much as a second album. Kappa 20:41, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, they made EPs in the 80s not albums, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 05:18, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as vanity. Radiant_* 09:49, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
    • There has been a red link to this band since August 2004. [1] Kappa 13:47, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • and ...? Chris 20:57, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
        • This implies that we should asume good faith, that someone wanted to help wikipedia out with something it wanted, not promote a band. Kappa 02:45, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
          • What makes you think we want this? No evidence of worthiness of a page in WP to be found. Chris 18:58, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
            • Just replying to Radiant's "vanity" theory. Kappa 20:41, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. No allmusic.com entry. No evidence of significant notability presented. Gamaliel 02:48, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable. VladMV ٭ talk 20:53, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • If I had a vote I'd vote Keep. Notable part of Finnish punk history. Interviewed by the one of the largest music magazines in finland (Soundi). And I just added some more content and references. (by 193.64.14.2 07:13, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC))
    • I guess it's too late now, but being interviewed by a large music magazine qualifies it under the guidelines. I think this is a case of a notable and influential band getting deleted because the original article was short. Kappa 07:26, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.