Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPLC TV Tower Fenton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-27 02:02Z

[edit] KPLC TV Tower Fenton

KPLC TV Tower Fenton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Viacom Communications Tower Duette (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

American Towers Tower Punta Gorda (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Second Generation of Iowa Tower Van Horne (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Waterman Broadcasting Tower Punta Gorda (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

WBBH TV Tower Tuckers Corner (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Telemundo Tower San Antonio (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Fort Myers Broadcasting Tower Punta Gorda (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

WPBF Tower Martin County (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Channel 34 TV Tower Palm City (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Nebraska Education Tower Bassett (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Texas Tall Tower Elmendorf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

As cleanup following successful batch deletions of unremarkable masts, I'm nominating another 12 radio and TV towers on mainland USA which are below 465 meters tall. None of the towers that I am nominating are notable in any way whatsoever, as far as I can tell. Most of these have been stubs for over a year, none have any substantial additional information other than their name, location and height. Delete per WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#IINFO. Ohconfucius 03:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all as none are notable. Did a small group of users embark on a project to document every radio tower in the USA on wikipedia? How did these all get on here? --Dmz5 05:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. MER-C 05:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Sr13 (T|C) 05:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. They seem to be getting taller, but still the articles lack multiple published references to show they are notable, and just are cut and pasted stale data circa April 2005 from a government database. Edison 16:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Not much else to add that hasn’t already been covered Fledgeling 17:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Bigtop 18:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Obina 20:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all as a big yawn. Maddy626 09:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom... and moving onward and upward... SkierRMH,23:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.