Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KBCO Studio C

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. — TKD::Talk 09:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] KBCO Studio C

KBCO Studio C (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This nomination is for an article about a radio show, and a long list of compilation albums they have published. The show may be relevant in the context of the broadcaster, KBCO, and is already described there. But no sources have been found to establish notability for separate articles, neither for the show nor for the albums. The article about the show just duplicates content from KBCO, even verbatim in some parts.

I also nominate the album articles, the most of which are simple track listings. Where they go beyond that, they might be copyright violations from the KBCO website; see in particular album #3 and the corresponding page from KBCO.

-- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 16:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Boy, I hate mass deletions like this - but, in this case, it's justified. All of the volume articles appear to be similarly formatted, all consisting of simple track listings. It appears that the albums collect live studio performances from a given year - if one of these performances were notable in and of itself, an album containing that performance might be notable for that reason - but I can find no evidence of that. The description of the show and the charity proceeds on the KBCO Studio C article might do well as a Merge into the main KBCO article - but, once merged, I'd recommend Delete for the main article and all volume articles, citing WP:MUSIC and, if the volume pages are as close to the KBCO page as volume 3 is, WP:COPYVIO. Best, ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. Rehevkor 17:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Not notable in my area, but if copyvios can be resolved, it would be like any of the other thousand album listings. Mbisanz 22:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 23:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I can't see any way to save these pages - non-notable. MarkBul 00:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all are just track listings and they lack notability Corpx 00:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - per nom. No independent notability for the show or the compilations. At best it merits one sentence in the article for the station from which they originate, certainly not separate articles for each compilation. Otto4711 03:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • delete per nom. Chris 06:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - I don't want to think about these ever again. Why would they issue such albums? Why do we care? SolidPlaid 08:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I'd equate this to the spam I get in my inbox almost. Pursey 12:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all but root article (weak keep root article). The radio show is vaguely notable, I think, but a catalog of each volume of show is not for here on Wikipedia. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all. Simply not-notable. Eusebeus 20:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.