Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K3407

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] K3407

K3407 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

non-notable (and incorrect title). It is one of hundreds of transistors. -- Alan Liefting- (talk) - 21:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete It's not a piece by Mozart, and the article fails to demonstrate why it is notable. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:01, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Article is in need of expansion and sourcing but there is quite a bit of precedent for articles of this type. (See Category:Commercial transistors). - Dravecky (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete The nominator is correct the title of the page is wrong. Follow the link for the data sheet. Even if the title was right why do we need a single page with only one line for a transistor. With as many transistors as there are this would overload the server with thousands of pages (that only had one line.) If this data does need to be in an online encyclopedia why can't it be on in a table on one or a group of pages about transistors? I just do not see the benifit of how that it is currently set up - Ctempleton3 (talk) 06:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment With 2,310,801 articles (and counting) on the English Wikipedia I doubt that even a thousand short articles on transistors would "overload the server". And please note that this stub should be expanded, as has been done with the other articles in Category:Commercial transistors. - Dravecky (talk) 08:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment. I don't know much about transistors and haven't researched on this one, so I'm not going to "vote", but just give general comments. Why is this transistor notable? The fact that it exists and that it has a manufacturer's data sheet is hardly enough to write an encyclopedia article. If there's something special about it and there are other references about it, the article could be expanded and kept. Otherwise, it should be deleted for lack of notability. --Itub (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.