Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juzam Djinn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. Ingoolemo talk 05:54, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Juzam Djinn

Unnecessary article on inconsequential Magic: The Gathering card (one of thousands). Article text is only marginally more than a copy from the card itself. (Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razia, Boros Archangel) Saberwyn 05:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nomination. Saberwyn 05:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
    • I'm liking the sound of redirect. Changing vote. Saberwyn 22:29, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. The Juzam Djinn is pretty high up there in terms of value and fame, actually, but nowhere near the P9, and as noted elsewhere even they don't get their own articles. Changing vote to redirect to Arabian Nights (Magic: The Gathering), since I see it's already mentioned there. --Aquillion 06:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep or merge somewhere, verifiable game card. Kappa 08:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per Power Nine precedent. Though I wouldn't be averse to this one being redirected to Arabian Nights (Magic: The Gathering), since it is the most well-known card of the set. -- Grev -- Talk 16:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
    • ...and now I'm changing to redirect there. -- Grev -- Talk 05:51, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Arabian Nights (Magic: The Gathering), as it's arguably the best-known card from that set. (Feel free to take this as a "delete" or "merge" if that will build a consensus.) - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 18:31, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Arabian Nights (Magic: The Gathering), as above. A rather famous card within the M:TG subculture. Kingfox 22:17, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.