Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Cause 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - using a bit of judgement, not a single one of those sources is reliable, anyway ... if/when a reliable source does appear, the article can be recreated. Proto::► 10:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Just Cause 2

Just Cause 2 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Pure speculation. Contested prod. MER-C 08:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NN. tgies 08:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a rumour mill. Prolog 09:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per nom. --ElectricEye (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. ← ANAS ^Talk? 16:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - More than speculation. According to all of these reports (and many more), Avalanche CEO Christofer Sundberg confirmed it's really being made. [1][2][3][4][5] --Oakshade 03:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep This "crystalball" is real per Oakshade: [6][7][8][9][10] --ElectricEye (talk) 04:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Sharkface217 05:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm surprised about this vote with the new info about it being reported that it's being made. --Oakshade 05:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Yes, Oakshade, I agree. Sharkface, some people actually try study the AFD's you know. ^_^ --ElectricEye (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.