The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:40, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Reverted the txt to original, it is complete nonsense, I know who made it! One for BJAODN methinks. Comments by the later editor I think are particullarly amusing! Jezze 17:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete non-verified. --Vsion 18:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete... at least someone stubbed it.--Isotope23 19:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete Probable hoax. chowells 19:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.