The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete as there are no scientific journal publications to support any of this theory- otherwise it is conspriacy-cruft.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete as unverified, unsourced conspiracy cruft. —LrdChaos 05:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.