Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juniper Shuey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus, defaulting to Keep. NawlinWiki 20:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Juniper Shuey

Juniper Shuey (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
Zoe Scofield (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

These two people are nonnotable, or noted only within a very limited artistic field. The critical acclaim cited in the article is not properly referenced, and is promotional in tone. This nomination is a follow-up on a WP:COIN report regarding Easywayout (talk · contribs). Shalom Hello 18:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

→ See also: Conflict of interest Noticeboard Case

  • Delete. Very limited notability. Certainly not enough for Wikipedia. Lorangriel 19:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep The nomination admits the notability within their field--exact sources were questioned; I quickly found two including the one that really matters, from the main publication in the field. -- And the world is contemporary modern dance choreography! Since when is this a negligible artistic field? As for COI. it doesnt matter who wrote the article, if the subject is in fact notable and if it's demonstrated by good sources. DGG 05:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep -- I hate COI editing, but I believe these two people are (weakly) notable:
Juniper Shuey: Seattle Weekly[1], The Seattle Times[2], Seattle Post-Intelligencer[3].
Zoe Scofield: Seattle Weekly[4], The Seattle Times[5], Seattle Post-Intelligencer[6]--A. B. (talk) 21:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.