Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior Varsity Magazine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. Singularity 03:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Junior Varsity Magazine

Junior Varsity Magazine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
The New Power Magazine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - related article added by Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

New magazine begun in 2007. Its only assertion of near-notability, being Mississippi's only magazine in that niche, is not supported with an independent source. The entire article cites no independent sources, for that matter. The article fails notability and verifiability criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 16:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

As original nominator, I also endorse the deletion of The New Power Magazine, added by Ten Pound Hammer, on reasoning similar to that for Junior Varsity Magazine. —C.Fred (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. It doesn't look notable to me and neither do any of the author's other articles:
Anthony Colom
The New Power Magazine
--DanielRigal (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, agree with everything said by the nom. Cirt (talk) 16:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete both, non-notable magazines, both claim to be the "only" magazine in their niches but no sources can verify that claim. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, lack of notability. If you read the fist draft that was posted, it says that there was only one issue published in 2007, and it is "slated for re-release in February 2008," which was why I "prod"ded it. --Dawn bard (talk) 17:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Both NN, no independent sources, promotional, etc... Mr Senseless (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.