Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumpswing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. PeaceNT 02:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jumpswing
Appears to be a non-notable phenomenon. No assertion of notability in the article and my internet search did not turn up any reliable sources regarding it. Chunky Rice 20:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - You say that you did not find any rliable sources in your internet search....that's odd my google search turned up many. Try again. This may not be as notable as the Jitterbug but passes notablility by my standard at least.--Amadscientist 05:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Care to provide links to some? All I saw were dance studios and whatnot.-Chunky Rice 05:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- What's wrong with dance studios? This is exactly the place where dances are. It is not, like, a single studio of the dance inventor, so you could have contested on the basis of vanity. Mukadderat 18:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with them, but for the purpose of establishing notability, they're not reliable sources as I understand them. -Chunky Rice 18:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- What's wrong with dance studios? This is exactly the place where dances are. It is not, like, a single studio of the dance inventor, so you could have contested on the basis of vanity. Mukadderat 18:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 00:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep per Google News hits. The Boston globe link expands on this. I cant tell anymore because of the pay to read links Corpx 04:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- keep, verifiable. However the article must be severely trimmed. In particular, all instruction ("howto") must go into wikibooks. Mukadderat 18:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep looks like sources exist, could use some cleanup though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
