Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Stern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and Salted as it is the 5th time it was deleted --JForget 00:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Julian Stern

Julian Stern (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Subject has not achieved anything worthy of an encyclopedia article Ground Zero | t 00:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete Doesn't meet the standards for notability by a longshot. Calgary 00:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unfortunately not speediable, as it atleast asserts that it is notable. However, none of those assertions seem to count, there are no independent sources, and this is likely a vanity page. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 01:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete I agree with Jayron that it is sad that we can't speedy this because the article makes some claim to notability; however these claims do not make the subject notable per WP:BIO's section on politicians . TonyBallioni 01:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Unfortunately the minor claims of notability lack independant third party sources. As a result the subject fails to meet the criteria of notability. AngelOfSadness talk 01:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete. No sign of notability found. His "famous quote" has 3 Google hits, all selfpublished by him. PrimeHunter 02:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete although he almost had me at Creedence fan. --Dhartung | Talk 02:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• keep for entertainment value... er wait, that isn't a valid reason... I guess, I'll have to switch to DELETE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Balloonman (talk • contribs) 07:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for nn. Doczilla 08:53, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:N. Lacks sources. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 16:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Clearly non-notable. TGreenburgPR 21:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.