Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Revermann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 21:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Julian Revermann

Julian Revermann (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I've checked claims and added a couple of links but I am still sceptical that this person is notable enough for an entry. Paste (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:BIO, no reliable secondary source coverage. KnightLago (talk) 19:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY. --Sharkface217 03:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete It fails if not more two of Wikipedia's article guidelines. I say delete as it has no notable content. Nothing444 14:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep If this article is deleted, I will lose three edits. Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 08:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. BWH76 (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.