Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Perretta (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Julian Perretta

Julian Perretta (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Does not meet WP:MUSIC; problems with WP:RS. Taroaldo (talk) 23:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Seems to be on the cusp of notability, what with a major label record deal and all, but still not quite there yet -- no chart singles, no album, no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Almost, but not quite - needs to actually release the album first. As on the previous discussion, if he makes good, then recreate. Otherwise fails WP:MUSIC. Frickeg (talk) 03:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete Oh so close and if it was significantly better sourced I'd have to ponder a flip to keep. Recreate (again) when the album is released. - Dravecky (talk) 06:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 12:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. The only coverage verging on significant found was the music week story reporting his contract, which is already linked to in the article. One for next year, perhaps.--Michig (talk) 18:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.